ICRA MUTUAL FUND
RATINGS
A Special Report
By P K Chowdhury, Managing
Director,
ICRA Limited
Background and Range of Service
ICRA has been providing
investors with independent, professional and reliable rating opinions on
debt instruments of corporate entities since 1991. It has now extended
its traditional rating services to include Ratings of Mutual Funds (initially
Debt Funds, viz., Money Market, Gilt and Bond Mutual Funds, will be covered).
The extension of service is aimed at addressing the perceived need among
investors and intermediaries for an informed, reliable and independent
opinion on the performance and the risks associated with investing in individual
Mutual Fund Schemes.
ICRA Mutual Funds Rating Services
include:
-
Performance Ratings (mf)
-
Credit Risk Ratings (mfC),
and
-
Market Risk Ratings (mfM)1
ICRA ratings are only
an opinion on the relative past-performance of a Mutual Fund scheme and
the various factors that can influence its future performance. ICRA Mutual
Fund Ratings are not a comment on the prospective returns, appreciation
potential, or future net asset value of the rated scheme. Like all other
ICRA ratings, Mutual Fund Ratings are only an opinion and not a recommendation
to invest or not to invest in any rated Mutual Fund scheme.
The Benefits
ICRA Mutual Fund Ratings
are designed to provide Investors, Intermediaries and Fund Sponsors/Asset
Management Companies (AMCs) with an independent opinion on the performance
and risks associated with various Mutual Fund schemes.
For the Investor,
the ratings:
-
Facilitate an informed investment
decision
-
Provide independent and
reliable opinion on:
* the relative performance of the Fund
* the relative credit quality of the portfolio
* the quality of the Fund’s management and operations
* the relative sensitivity of the scheme to changes in
interest rate
-
Help meet specific investment
objectives
For the Intermediaries,
the ratings help to:
Provide informed advice
to investors
-
Offer products matching
the specific return-risk preferences of investors
-
Enhance the marketability
of various schemes
-
Differentiate the various
schemes from other rated/non-rated schemes using the ICRA ratings
For the Fund Sponsors/AMCs,
the ratings :
-
Provide an assessment made
by an independent rating agency
-
Serve as a marketing tool
to differentiate a scheme from other
-
available schemes
-
Help meet investors’ rating
requirements
-
Provide for benchmarking
of performance
The Rating Process
ICRA initiates the Fund
Rating process on receipt of a formal request from the Fund Sponsors. The
Fund is then appraised of ICRA’s information requirements and given an
agenda for discussions. Subsequently, based on an analysis of the information
submitted, discussions with the Fund management, and validation and cross-checking
of data against in-house and other secondary research, ICRA’s team of analysts
presents a detailed Rating Report to ICRA’s Rating Committee, which then
assigns the rating. The rating process is highly interactive, involving
discussions with the key operating personnel of the Fund.Usually, the assignment
of the rating takes three to four weeks after all the necessary information
has been provided. ICRA ensures complete confidentiality of the information
provided and makes only those ratings public that have been accepted by
the Fund management. ICRA monitors all its accepted ratings on a quarterly
basis. During these quarterly reviews, the ratings may be retained or raised
(up or down), on the basis of the performance of the rated scheme.
Performance Ratings
The Performance Rating
(mf) of a Mutual Fund scheme is a symbolic indicator of ICRA’s current
opinion on the relative performance of the scheme and the sensitivities
because of the associated risks. This opinion is based on an evaluation
of the scheme’s past performance and an assessment of other factors that
are likely to determine its future performance. The factors that are assessed
include:
* Past Risk
Adjusted Return Performance
-
total returns suitably adjusted
for past volatility (or risk) with greater emphasis on under performance
-
emphasis on performance
during stress
-
performance benchmarking
with other similar schemes
-
higher weightage to past
performance for schemes with longer operating history .
* Other qualitative
factors including associated risks
-
Investment objective/guidelines/policies
-
Quality of the Fund’s management,
its investment style, systems and controls.
-
Credit Risk of the scheme’s
portfolio.
-
Interest Rate Risk based
on:
-portfolio structure
with respect to time-to-maturity
-portfolio duration
and convexity.
-
Liquidity Risk of the scheme
-
Fund’s compliance with regulations.
-
Fund’s disclosure standards
and accounting quality.
All accepted mf Ratings
are subject to a quarterly review. A rating may be maintained or revised
(up or down) on the basis of the actual performance of the scheme or other
developments. Mf Ratings are only an opinion on the relative past performance
of the scheme concerned and the various factors that can influence its
future performance. mfC Ratings are not a comment on the prospective returns,
appreciation potential or future net asset value of the rated scheme.To
start with, ICRA’s mf ratings will cover only Debt Funds-Money Market,
Gilt and Bond Mutual Funds-that have completed at least six months of operations.Subsequently,
the scope of this service will be enlarged to include ratings of various
Equity and Balanced Funds.
Credit Risk Ratings
The Credit Risk Rating
(mfC) of a Debt Fund is a symbolic indicator of ICRA’s current opinion
on the relative credit quality of the Fund’s investment portfolio. Specifically,
ICRA ratings address the relative expected loss a Fund can suffer because
of the default risk of its investment portfolio. The focus of an mfC assessment
is on the downside risk. To measure the expected loss (or downside), ICRA
uses its own estimates of the default risk associated with each rating
category. ICRA makes its own assessment of the implicit rating of investments,
which are rated or not rated by ICRA. An mfC Rating is not a comment on
the future performance of the Fund with respect to price appreciation potential,
volatility of the net asset value, or its yield mfC Ratings are based on
an evaluation of both qualitative and quantitative factors, including:
-
Published investment objective
-
Fund’s investment guidelines/policies
and style
-
Quality of Fund’s management,
its systems and controls
-
Portfolio composition, its
diversification and credit quality of the underlying investments
-
Fund’s disclosure standards
and accounting quality.
All accepted mfC Ratings
are subject to a quarterly review. An mfC Rating may be maintained or revised
(up or down) on the basis of the actual performance or other developments.
Market Risk Ratings
A Market Risk Rating
(mfM)is a symbolic indicator of the relative sensitivity of a scheme’s
net asset value and total returns to changes in the interest rate and other
market conditions. mfM Ratings are forward looking and focus on the downside
risk. Specifically, mfM Ratings address the extend of loss a scheme’s portfolio
value can suffer because of changes, such as increase in the interest rate
. An mfM Rating is a measure of the relative volatility and loss severity
of a scheme, and does not attempt to predict its performance, price appreciation
or yield potential. mfM Ratings are relative to the performance of other
schemes with similar investment objectives and are based on an evaluation
of both qualitative and quantitative factors, including:
-
published investment objective
-
investment guidelines/policies
and style
-
quality of the Funds management,
its systems and controls
-
credit risk of the investment
portfolio
-
exposure to interest rate
risk, based on :
* portfolio
structure with respect to time-to-maturity
* portfolio
duration and convexity
-
liquidity risk
-
composition and profile
of investors
All accepted mfM Ratings
are subject to a quarterly review. Ratings may be maintained or revised
(up or down) on the basis of the actual performance of the scheme or other
devlopments.
|